fbpx

Ethicon Physiomesh

Physiomesh is a brand of synthetic, shaped, hernia mesh manufactured by Ethicon, a leading business unit/subsidiary of the global drug, medical device, and consumer products giant, Johnson & Johnson (J&J). Current J&J CEO, Alex Gorsky, actually came to the company from Ethicon following its acquisition. In 2019, J&J’s highly profitable surgical device division reported $9.5 billion in sales worldwide.

Ethicon marketed its flexible composite Physiomesh as a device to aid with laparoscopic hernia procedures. However, due to thousands of reports of adverse surgical outcomes sent to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Ethicon voluntarily withdrew Physiomesh for laparoscopic procedures in 2016. As of today, at least 2,820 hernia patients who underwent procedures with Physiomesh are now claimants in multidistrict litigation alleging they have suffered injuries and pain resulting from their being implanted with the device.

Background and History of Physiomesh

The use of surgical mesh to repair hernias dates back to the late 19th century and today is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States. Among modern hernia surgeries, a mesh is used in more than 80% and there are more than 70 types of mesh products available on the market.  

Physiomesh is made with a non-absorbent, macroporous polypropylene material that was aggressively marketed for both open hernia repairs as well as minimally invasive laparoscopic surgeries. Physiomesh has a unique design incorporating five (5) layers: two layers of poliglecaprone-25 (“Monocryl”) film covering two underlying layers of polydioxanone film (“PDS”), which in turn coat the polypropylene mesh. Like the vast majority of mesh products available in the United States, Physiomesh was fast-tracked for sale through the FDA’s 510(k) Clearance process.

What is Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Surgery?

There are three main types of hernia repair surgery available in the United States: “open”; laparoscopic and robotic. Open hernia repair is a more traditional method and involves making a sizable incision in the groin, where a surgeon pushes a hernia back, closes the abdominal wall with sutures, and then closes the incision with multiple sutures.

Conversely, laparoscopic hernia repair is a minimally invasive procedure that uses a thin, telescopic instrument (known as a laparoscope) inserted through the patient’s belly-button under general anesthesia. The abdomen is then inflated with gaseous carbon dioxide and the mesh is placed on the inside of the abdominal wall. Once completed, the incision is closed with one or two sutures or surgical tape. The ostensible benefit of laparoscopic surgery is a reduction in scarring and a shorter recovery time.

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit

Flexible Physiomesh Complications

The market for synthetic mesh products is both profitable and competitive.  Additionally, synthetic mesh devices, like Physiomesh, are almost always routed through the FDA”s fast-track 510(k) clearance process which does not require manufacturers to support marketing applications with large amounts of safety and efficacy data. Consequently, these products make it onto the market and into our bodies without much scrutiny and potential complications are sometimes overlooked.

Post-market surveillance of flexible (laparoscopic) Physiomesh indicated defects causing premature disintegration, tissue adhesion, contraction, and organ perforation. Due to the number of post-market “adverse event” reports coming back to Ethicon and the FDA, Ethicon voluntarily withdrew the flexible version of its Physiomesh line from the market in 2016. The “open” version is still available on the market for ventral hernia repair.

Physiomesh Lawsuits

Starting in 2017, patients claiming they were injured and suffering from implantation with flexible Physiomesh filed the first initial lawsuits naming Ethicon and J&J. As these lawsuits began to accumulate and grow in number, they were consolidated into multidistrict litigation in federal court in Georgia (MDL-2782). Today there are thousands of claimants integrated into the MDL and the first “bellwether” cases are expected to commence in late 2020. In addition to the MDL, several state cases are proceeding on another track in New Jersey.


Sources Cited (15)

1) “Ethicon Physiomesh for Open Ventral Hernia Repair” https://www.jnjmedicaldevices.com/en-US/product/open-ventral-hernia-repair-physiomesh-hernia-mesh

2) “Ethicon Hernia Portfolio: Evidence Summary” https://www.jnjmedicaldevices.com/sites/default/files/user_uploaded_assets/pdf_assets/2019-10/Ethicon-Hernia-Portfolio-Evidence-008101-180511.pdf

3) “J&J’s Ethicon recalls Physiomesh flexible composite hernia mesh” https://www.massdevice.com/jjs-ethicon-recalls-physiomesh-flexible-composite-hernia-mesh/

4) “Hernia Mesh Lawsuits: History and Developments” https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/hernia-mesh-lawsuits-history-and-developments.html

5) “EARLY CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF HERNIA REPAIR WITH PHYSIOMESH” https://www.sages.org/meetings/annual-meeting/abstracts-archive/early-clinical-outcomes-of-hernia-repair-with-physiomesh/

6) “MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC, PHYSIOMESH” https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=2543604

7) “MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON PHYSIOMESH” https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfMAUDE/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=2363232&pc=FTL

8) “The Importance of Registries in the Postmarketing Surveillance of Surgical Meshes” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6250300/

9) “Nationwide Long-term Outcome Surveillance of Physiomesh® vs. Other Meshes in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair” https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03846661

10) “Class 2 Device Recall Surgical mesh” https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfres/res.cfm?id=138394

11) “Hernia Repair Surgery” https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/17967-hernia-repair-surgery

12) “Open surgery better than laparoscopic for repair of inguinal hernia” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC403835/

13) “LAPAROSCOPIC REMOVAL OF INGUINAL HERNIA MESH PLACED DURING A ROBOTIC TAPP HERNIA REPAIR IN A PATIENT WITH CHRONIC PAIN” https://www.sages.org/video/laparoscopic-removal-of-inguinal-hernia-mesh-placed-during-a-robotic-tapp-hernia-repair-in-a-patient-with-chronic-pain/

14) “Mind the gap: imaging spectrum of abdominal ventral hernia repair complications” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439043/#:~:text=any%20abdominal%20surgery.-,Specific%20complications%20related%20to%20hernia%20repair%20include%20recurrent%20hernia%2C%20mesh,%2C%20fistula%20formation%2C%20and%20infertility.

15) “Johnson & Johnson: Annual Report 2019” https://www.investor.jnj.com/annual-meeting-materials/2019-annual-report

Tracy Everhart is the Editor for Drug Law Journal. A highly-trained and certified medical professional, Tracy is also an accomplished medical writer. After spending years on the front lines of the medical profession, Tracy now devotes her expertise and skills to researching and reporting on new drugs and devices that enter the market, as well as their side-effects and the real-life stories involved. Prior to joining Drug Law Journal, Tracy wrote for benchmark online healthcare resources focused on families and, in particular, women’s health issues. Tracy holds post-graduate degrees from both the American College of Healthcare Sciences and the Yale School of Nursing. She is also a graduate of both Hampshire College, where she studied microbiology and the University of South Carolina school of nursing.

Drug Law Journal Legal Sponsorship

Drug Law Journal's publishing and research are sponsored by the DDP Injury Law Group in Washington, D.C. Their legal team is focused on protecting the rights of injury victims.
Furthermore, they understand and appreciate the importance of a trusted attorney-client relationship.
The DDP Injury Law Group uses their years of experience with litigation to ensure their clients can fight for the compensation they deserve.

Always seek the advice of a medical professional when making personal health choices.

The Offices of DrugLawJournal.com are located at:

1800 North Orange Avenue, Suite C
Orlando, Florida 32804

DrugLawJournal.com is sponsored by the DDP Injury Law Group, and therefore may be considered attorney advertising. The information contained on DrugLawJournal.com is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or medical advice on any subject matter. No viewers of this site should discontinue taking a prescribed medication on the basis of any information on this site and should always first consult with a doctor concerning any medication. Viewers should understand that if they refrain from taking prescribed medication without appropriate medical advice they can suffer injury or death.

No viewers of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the viewer’s state. Viewing information from DrugLawJournal.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and DDP Injury Law Group or DrugLawJournal.com nor is it intended to do so.The content of DrugLawJournal.com may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. Prior results do not predict a similar outcome. For more information, please visit our web site’s disclaimer.

©2024 DrugLawJournal.com | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive peroidic updates from our expert team of researchers, highlighting defective drugs, devices, and legal issues related to your health.

Email Catcher
Free Drug and Medical Device Case Review

Free Drug and Medical Device Case Review

Share your story with us and we will reach out to you about your case.

First
Last
Described what happened to you, we will review and reach out to you about your situation.

It is important for those who have suffered injury from dangerous drugs and medical devices to know that they have may have options.

Consumers have the ability to seek legal remedies for their injuries resulting from the negligence of drug and device manufacturers. The first step toward justice and recovery is sharing your story with effective legal counsel. An attorney will help you to better understand the issues and discuss the possibility of compensation for your suffering.

Once you complete the information request above, Drug Law Journal will send the information to a specialist at our legal sponsor’s firm, the DDP Injury Law Group, in Washington, D.C. That specialist will follow-up with you directly to gather further specific information about your case and make an evaluation. If the firm is able to move forward on your case, they will also discuss next steps. Remember – the entire consult and evaluation is free to you. You only need to take the first step to fill out the contact form or call: (800) 597-1870 for immediate assistance.