fbpx

DePuy Synthes Orthopedics

One of the largest orthopedic and surgical device companies in the world, with a commanding market share of the total number of implanted hip and knee devices in the United States, DePuy Synthes Orthopedics is a business unit of global drug and device company, Johnson & Johnson. DePuy has one of the more comprehensive portfolios of orthopedic products and its primary focus is to provide options for reconstruction of damaged or diseased joints as well as other skeletal injuries. Despite its larger-than-life size and reputation, DePuy has also garnered its share of troubling headlines over the past 10-20 years concerning lawsuits stemming from its ASR and Pinnacle hip implant technologies. Indeed, hip implant technology verdicts and lawsuits numbering in excess of 20,000 parties have already cost the company more than $6 billion.

History and Background of DePuy Synthes

DePuy’s origins trace back to 1895 and the company’s founder, Revra DePuy, a chemist and pharmaceutical salesman from Warsaw, Indiana. Known then as the DePuy Manufacturing Company, it was established with the idea of manufacturing fiber splints that could be customized to fit patients and which were superior to the commonly fashioned wooden splints of the day.

DePuy continued to grow and following Revra DePuy’s death in 1921, the company shifted its focus to newer cutting-edge technologies fashioning artificial joints and spinal repair techniques. DePuy’s advances in these fields helped to shape the modern orthopedic device industry and transformed it into a preeminent leader in technology investment and innovation.

Johnson & Johnson acquired DePuy in 1998 for $3.5 billion and in 2012 coupled it with another acquisition of the firm Synthes. Last year alone, the DePuy Synthes unit reported $2.41 billion in revenue for Johnson & Johnson. 

Hip Implant Lawsuit

Issues with DePuy Hip Implant Technologies and Product Lines

DePuy ASR XL Acetabular System and ASR Hip Resurfacing Resurfacing Platform (MDL-2197)

DePuy manufactured the ASR Hip Implant Device line and is a business unit of the global device giant, Johnson & Johnson. The ASR XL Acetabular System was made up of three components:

  • The metal femoral stem inserted inside of the femur
  • The metal femoral head (or ball) connected to the stem; and
  • The metal acetabular cup (socket)

Similarly, the ASR Hip Resurfacing Platform involves a metal cap placed over the natural femoral head and replacing the acetabulum with a metal cup.

Beginning in 2008, the FDA started receiving approximately 400 complaints from patients in the United States who were implanted with the devices. These patients complained of pain, swelling, inflammation, and damage to the bone and tissue – as well as a lack of mobility. Many of these patients required expensive and painful revision surgeries.  

In 2010, DePuy issued a voluntary recall of ASR Hip Implant Devices and the first lawsuits naming DePuy soon followed thereafter. The cases were consolidated into an MDL and between 2013 and 2017, DePuy paid nearly $4.8 billion to settle approximately 7,500 cases.

It has been over ten years since the original ASR recall. And although this MDL is technically still open, settlement protocols have a stipulated deadline for potential litigants requiring revision surgery to have been performed no later than July 2017.

DePuy Pinnacle Hip Replacement System with TrueGlide Technology (MDL-2244)

The DePuy Pinnacle Acetabular Cup System was launched in 2001 and offered the option of either polyethylene or metal insert for use with a titanium cup to replace the natural hip socket. This was followed by the launch of the Pinnacle system coupled with TrueGlide technology in 2007.

Although the Pinnacle system was not subject to recall, patients still reported many of the same issues as those suffering from the DePuy ASR devices. Issues with loose implants, inflammation, swelling, and damage to surrounding tissue coupled with the spread of metal debris and contamination throughout the body were not infrequent. Many patients implanted with Pinnacle devices suffered the loss of mobility and went through painful and expensive revision surgeries in an attempt to correct issues.

Lawsuits involving the Pinnacle Hip Replacement System were aggregated into an MDL in a federal courtroom in Texas. In 2016, the second bellwether case in the MDL yielded a verdict in favor of the claimants to the tune of $502 million (later reduced under Texas law limiting punitive damages). A third bellwether case resulted in a $1 billion verdict in favor of claimants (reduced to $543 million on appeal) and a fourth bellwether case wound up with a $247 million verdict in favor of claimants.

In June 2019, DePuy announced that it would settle up to 6,000 of the Pinnacle lawsuits for $1 billion. DePuy is settling each case individually and as a consequence, this MDL remains open with up to 9,155 cases still pending.


Sources Cited (20)

1. “DePuy Synthes” https://www.jnjmedicaldevices.com/en-US/companies/depuy-synthes

2. “Our History” https://www.jnjmedicaldevices.com/en-US/companies/depuy-synthes/about-depuy-synthes/our-history

3. “DePuy Synthes Financial Statements” https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.depuy_synthes_inc.6dc63aa888fefa5e7a1271ab10b6d53f.html#financials-anchor

4. “$502 Million Dollar Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson In DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implant MDL” https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/502-million-dollar-verdict-against-johnson-johnson-in-depuy-pinnacle-hip-implant-mdl/#:~:text=The%20jury%20in%20this%20bellwether,%24360%20million%20in%20punitive%20damages.

5. “Lessons Emerging from Pinnacle Hip Bellwether Trials” https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e8bb3be1-5777-48b8-a31f-3b9757ff2541

6. “In re: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation” https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e8bb3be1-5777-48b8-a31f-3b9757ff2541

7. “U.S. ASR Hip Settlement” https://www.usasrhipsettlement.com/

8. “Johnson & Johnson to Settle Hip Lawsuits for About $1 billion, Sources Say” https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-johnson-johnson-settle-pinnacle-metal-hip-implant-20190507-story.html

9. “Metal-on-metal: history, state of the art (2010)” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3032111/#:~:text=Typically%2C%20the%20first%20total%20hip,generation%20metal%2Don%2Dmetal.

10. “Hip Replacement Market to reach USD 10.51 Billion by 2026, Increasing Prevalence of Osteoarthritis to Boost Market, Predicts Fortune Business Insights” https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/12/09/1957817/0/en/Hip-Replacement-Market-to-reach-USD-10-51-Billion-by-2026-Increasing-Prevalence-of-Osteoarthritis-to-Boost-Market-Predicts-Fortune-Business-Insights.html

11. “DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation” https://www.ohnd.uscourts.gov/mdl-2197

12. “Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Adverse Reactions and Patient Management” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598667/#:~:text=Metal%2Don%2Dmetal%20relates%20to,metal%20acetabular%20cup%20or%20liner.

13. “NIH researchers uncover clues related to metal-on-metal hip implants” https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-researchers-uncover-clues-related-metal-metal-hip-implants

14. “Metal-on-metal hip replacements: implications for general practice” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697529/

15. “What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5810829/

16. “Metal ion levels comparison: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing vs total hip arthroplasty in patients requiring revision surgery” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180337/

17. “Management of metal-on-metal hip implant patients: Who, when and how to revise?” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4865716/

18. “Heavy Metal? Recognizing Complications of Metal on Metal Hip Arthroplasty” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158987/

19. “Management Guidelines for Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Strategy on Follow Up” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525522/

20. “Outcomes of a metal-on-metal total hip replacement system” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4473440/

Tracy Everhart is the Editor for Drug Law Journal. A highly-trained and certified medical professional, Tracy is also an accomplished medical writer. After spending years on the front lines of the medical profession, Tracy now devotes her expertise and skills to researching and reporting on new drugs and devices that enter the market, as well as their side-effects and the real-life stories involved. Prior to joining Drug Law Journal, Tracy wrote for benchmark online healthcare resources focused on families and, in particular, women’s health issues. Tracy holds post-graduate degrees from both the American College of Healthcare Sciences and the Yale School of Nursing. She is also a graduate of both Hampshire College, where she studied microbiology and the University of South Carolina school of nursing.

Drug Law Journal Legal Sponsorship

Drug Law Journal's publishing and research are sponsored by the DDP Injury Law Group in Washington, D.C. Their legal team is focused on protecting the rights of injury victims.
Furthermore, they understand and appreciate the importance of a trusted attorney-client relationship.
The DDP Injury Law Group uses their years of experience with litigation to ensure their clients can fight for the compensation they deserve.

Always seek the advice of a medical professional when making personal health choices.

The Offices of DrugLawJournal.com are located at:

1800 North Orange Avenue, Suite C
Orlando, Florida 32804

DrugLawJournal.com is sponsored by the DDP Injury Law Group, and therefore may be considered attorney advertising. The information contained on DrugLawJournal.com is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or medical advice on any subject matter. No viewers of this site should discontinue taking a prescribed medication on the basis of any information on this site and should always first consult with a doctor concerning any medication. Viewers should understand that if they refrain from taking prescribed medication without appropriate medical advice they can suffer injury or death.

No viewers of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the viewer’s state. Viewing information from DrugLawJournal.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and DDP Injury Law Group or DrugLawJournal.com nor is it intended to do so.The content of DrugLawJournal.com may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. Prior results do not predict a similar outcome. For more information, please visit our web site’s disclaimer.

©2024 DrugLawJournal.com | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive peroidic updates from our expert team of researchers, highlighting defective drugs, devices, and legal issues related to your health.

Email Catcher
Free Drug and Medical Device Case Review

Free Drug and Medical Device Case Review

Share your story with us and we will reach out to you about your case.

First
Last
Described what happened to you, we will review and reach out to you about your situation.

It is important for those who have suffered injury from dangerous drugs and medical devices to know that they have may have options.

Consumers have the ability to seek legal remedies for their injuries resulting from the negligence of drug and device manufacturers. The first step toward justice and recovery is sharing your story with effective legal counsel. An attorney will help you to better understand the issues and discuss the possibility of compensation for your suffering.

Once you complete the information request above, Drug Law Journal will send the information to a specialist at our legal sponsor’s firm, the DDP Injury Law Group, in Washington, D.C. That specialist will follow-up with you directly to gather further specific information about your case and make an evaluation. If the firm is able to move forward on your case, they will also discuss next steps. Remember – the entire consult and evaluation is free to you. You only need to take the first step to fill out the contact form or call: (800) 597-1870 for immediate assistance.